A bit of a programming note. Over the next two weeks I will have some visitors, and will be traveling much, so it’s unlikely I will be able to post. I would like to do another one of these question and answer type blogs, so I’d encourage you to, over the next two weeks, send me any questions you have about microfinance, Kiva, Guatemalan culture, how to make a tortilla, and the theory of relativity. I’ll do my best to answer them upon my return. On to your questions.
I’m not sure what you mean when you say Kiva doesn’t charge interest, but your institution does. What do you mean?Sorry that wasn’t clearer. When loaners fund a loan on Kiva, the money goes to the MFI, in my case, it’s FAPE. FAPE in turn is giving the money to the entrepreneur funded on the website. When the entrepreneur pays back that money to FAPE, then FAPE in turn, gives the money to Kiva. Kiva, when lending the money to FAPE, does not ask for interest on the money, only that, if the entrepreneur pays back the FAPE, that FAPE return the money; however, FAPE still charges interest to the entrepreneur to make up for all of the costs of operation. Many studies can be done as to what the fairest interest rate is, but it has to be high so that the MFI can subsist.
Question: so what’s the point of pumping money through Kiva then? Couldn’t you just have a database of MFI’s, and the interest rates might decline because the MFI’s wouldn’t be beholden to anyone but their entrepreneurs, so they’d feel less pressure to protect themselves? Not sure if that would work for or against actually.
Well, Kiva is kind of like a database for all MFI’s, except they do a lot of dirty work for MFI’s. There are many reasons why Kiva, or some sort of other lending website, must exist for to be able to loan to individual entrepreneurs. I will outline the two biggest ones that I see.
-
Sending money costs money. Unless you are Kiva. And you have the first ever free payment-processing capability through Paypal. Notice, if you have ever sold something on Ebay, Paypal takes a cut. Transfering money via Western Union? They eat some of your moolah. Even those of you who have donated to me directly to my paypal account, I lose about 3%, because paypal takes a that money (this excludes Kiva gift certificates, those do not have a percentage taken away). Kiva enables 100% off lender’s money to get to entrepreneurs. That is not something easily acheived. That is something that other “Save a Child Organizations” cannot promise. No overhead costs (besides the optional donation). And that is something that MFIs could not do on their own.
-
Building a website is hard work. Maintaining a website is hard work. Responding to lenders is hard work. This, Kiva does for MFIs. Have you ever noticed how easy to use Kiva is? This is because about half of Kiva’s staff is engineers, and they are dedicated to making helping others, easier for the non-tech savvy people. Many MFIs do not have the resources nor the knowledge to be able to carry out website processes, let alone to be able to respond in English to many of the lender’s queries. More than that, Kiva brings many MFIs together so that lenders can choose which ones they want to lend to. They don’t have 100 different websites to go to just to find someone they want to lend to.
Dovetailing off of that, you say it’s all an experiment for you, could you talk a bit more about whether you think KIVA itself makes sense for these communities (I understand they sponsor your blog…)?
Kiva doesn’t really sponsor my blog. I just believe in Kiva, so I have the banners up. They have, however, enabled me to have wonderful experiences here that allow me to write the blog. So in that sense, they sponsor it.
But does Kiva make sense? Is it worth it for the MFIs to go through the hard work of uploading borrower profiles, doing journals, dealing with slow web connections? The answer to that is probably. MFIs have many sources of funding. Kiva is one source. Other sources can be other philanthropic organizations or banks looking to make money. For sustainability purposes and if something should happen to Kiva, an MFI can recieve no more than 30% of its funds from Kiva. My MFI, FAPE, gets, on a quaterly basis, 10-15% of its funding from Kiva. And like I said above, Kiva gives the money at no interest to FAPE. Other sources of funding can require an interest of around 6 or 7%. I think that if you quantified the money and time it took to do everything an MFI does for Kiva, it would be less than 6 or 7%. So it that way, Kiva does make sense.
Does Kiva make sense for the individual borrower? I can only speak to FAPE’s case on this matter. But before FAPE was using Kiva as a funding source, they would only do small group loans. Kiva has enable FAPE to take on a little more risks with higher loans to individuals. These risks, help the entrepreneurs grow more.
However, interest rate on Kiva loans, and interst rate on loans from other sources of funding remain the same. So in this sense the borrower does not benefit. But when doing the journal updates, time and time again, I have heard borrowers say to me that they are so happy that other people care what they are doing. So I do think they get some sort of motivational boost from Kiva.
Me again, have you noticed any tension between the women – sugar mamas- and men -sugar recipients? If so, how do you give self-worth to the men as well and deal with these changing economic dynamics?
This is a tricky dynamic. I haven’t really noticed that there is a tension, but I honestly don’t think I have been in a position to view this sort of family dynamic. Guatemalans will hide problems from even from their closest friends. It’s an interesting culture. So I can’t really say for sure on this matter.
It is true what you say, that you can’t just ignore the men, but studies have shown women use their extra income to invest in their children, and healthcare. Such studies have not shown the same thing for men. Also, generally speaking, men have more property and more collateral in developing places. This gives them a better chance at getting a loan from a bank. Microfinance targets those who have been excluded from the finance sector, e.g. women without resources. But you will see microfinance loans to men and on a case by case basis, a man may be just as responsible as a women. It is just that, as a general rule, women are better to invest in than men if your goal is to alleviate poverty. Here’s some good reading to start on this topic.
That’s all the questions for now folks. Send more when you got em. Have a safe and happy New Year.


t. Now a business can be very loosely defined, as nothing more than a place in the market where you sell beans that you buy from farmers, but it has to be a profitable business. For example, my institution will no longer give loans to people who are raising pigs to sell, because that market is not very strong these days. Instead, they encouraging these people to raise chickens, which is a good market in Guatemala.







